Date: 2011-12-01 05:13 pm (UTC)
nagaina: (Default)
From: [personal profile] nagaina
I think it's a little bit of both.

The Horde has the advantage, storytelling-wise, of possessing extreme moral ambiguity: a checkered past, an uncertain future, an unstable internal political situation. It would take extreme incompetence to not be able to spin story gold out of the Horde in its current configuration.

The Alliance, by way of contrast, has some of the advantages and disadvantages of being the standard Designated Fantasy Good Guys -- they've got righteousness and virtuousness, an untroubled relationship with the setting's Big Good figures (the Dragon Aspects, the Ancients) and most of the neutral factions, internal stability. Their story, as a consequence, comes across as feeling very, very vanilla, generic-fantasy-good-guy when contrasted with the Horde.

Added to this is the application of the "villains and morally ambiguous characters act while Real Heroes™ react" narrative convention -- both sides get this when dealing with Real Villains™ such as the Scourge or the Twilight's Hammer, but the Alliance also catches a dose of this while dealing with the Horde, which can get extremely frustrating.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

adventures_in_azeroth: (Default)
Adventures in Azeroth

March 2013

S M T W T F S
     12
34 56789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 9th, 2025 04:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios